Jim Jordan Goes Scorched Earth, Brings Down Entire Dem House of Cards In Fiery Opening Statement

By
Gary Fenster
-

“I want to thank you for having the courage to say we are going to get the politics out of the Department of Justice that was there in the previous administration,” Jim Jordan started before he brought down the Dem house of cards with a fiery denunciation of Obama and the gang.

Jordan said, “SPYING, THAT ONE WORD, THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE AFTER YOU FOR. 2019 IN A SENTENCE — PUTTING 19, YOU SAID THAT SPYING ON A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN IS A BIG DEAL. SPYING ON A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN IS A BIG DEAL.

IT SURE IS. SINCE THAT DAY I MUST THAT DAY, WHEN YOU HAD THE COURAGE TO STATE THE TRUTH, THEY ATTACK TO YOU AND HAVE BEEN ATTACKING YOU EVERY SENSE, EVERY DAY, EVERY WEEK, SIMPLY FOR STATING THE TRUTH THAT THE OBAMA BIDEN ADMINISTRATION SPIED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. ONE YEAR AGO “THE NEW YORK TIMES” SAID THIS — PAYING AN AIDE TO INVESTIGATE, SENDING A YOUNG LADY TO MEET PAPADOPOULOS. THEY SAID SOMEONE PRETENDING TO BE SOMEONE ELSE WAS SENT TO MEET A PERSON ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. YOU KNOW WHAT THEY CALL THAT?

 

YOU KNOW WHAT THEY CALL THAT? SPYING. ONE MONTH LATER, OCTOBER OF 2016, THEY USE THE DOSSIER TO FIRE CARTER PAGE. A SALACIOUS, UNVERIFIED DOSSIERS. JIM COMEY’S WORDS. SAID THEY DIDN’T TELL THE COURT THAT THE GUY WHO WROTE THE DOCUMENT HAD ALREADY COMMUNICATED TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT THAT HE WAS DESPERATE TO STOP TRUMP FROM GETTING ELECTED. GUESS WHAT? THERE WERE 15 MORE LIES THAT THEY TOLD THE COURT. 17 IN TOTAL, OUTLINED BY THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.

EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM IN HIS 400 PAGE REPORT. GUESS WHAT? CHAIRMAN NADLER REFUSES TO ALLOW MR. HORWITZ TO COME ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE 17 LIES THAT THE OBAMA BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TOLD TO THE SECRET COURT. THE OBAMA BIDEN DOJ OPENED THE INVESTIGATION IN JULY AND USED A SECRET AGENT LADY IN AUGUST AND LIED TO THE COURT IN SEPTEMBER. THEY DID ALL OF THIS WITHOUT ANY BASIS FOR LAUNCHING THE INVESTIGATION TO BEGIN WITH. HOW DO WE KNOW THAT?

HOW DO WE KNOW THERE WAS NO BASIS? THEY TOLD US. THEY DIDN’T WANT TO, BUT THANKS TO GRENELL, WHO RELEASED THE TRANSCRIPT OF THEIR TESTIMONY, WE NOW KNOW THAT THERE WAS NO BASIS FOR THEM TO START THE INVESTIGATION IN THE FIRST PLACE. SUSAN RICE, HERE’S WHAT SHE SAID. “I DON’T RECALL INTELLIGENCE I WOULD CONSIDER EVIDENCE OF A CONSPIRACY.” HOW ABOUT JAMES CLAPPER? “I NEVER SAW ANY EVIDENCE THAT THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WAS CONSPIRING WITH THE RUSSIANS TO MEDDLE IN THE ELECTION.” SAY THAT AGAIN, “I NEVER SAW EVIDENCE,” YET THEY INVESTIGATE HIM. THERE WAS NEVER A PROPER PREDICATE, SO WHY DID THEY DO IT? THEY TOLD US THAT, TOO. PETER STRZOK, AUGUST 2016, ASKED , IS TRUMP GOING TO WIN? WHAT WAS HIS RESPONSE? MEMBER, THIS IS STRUCK, THE GUY THAT WON THE — RUN — RAN THE INVESTIGATION. “NO, NO HE’S NOT, WE’LL STOP IT.

OCTOBER, THEY USE THE FAKE DOSSIER IN THE COURT. GUESS WHAT HAPPENS IN NOVEMBER? GUESS WHAT HAPPENS IN NOVEMBER? NOVEMBER 8, 2016, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GET IN THEIR WAY. 63 MILLION OF THEM TO BE BACK. NOW EVERYTHING CHANGES. NOW THE REAL FOCUS IS WHILE, WAIT A MINUTE, WE DIDN’T STOP HIM, HE WON. NOW WHAT DO THEY HAVE TO DO? THEY HAVE TO DO THE COVER UP. WHO DO THEY HAVE TO GO AFTER? WHO IS TARGET NUMBER ONE? THE FORMER HEAD OF THE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. THE GUY ABOUT TO BECOME NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR TO THE PRESIDENT, MICHAEL FLYNN. THEY CAN’T HAVE HIM HANGING AROUND, HE WILL FIGURE IT OUT. SO, THEY DECIDE TO GO AFTER MICHAEL FLYNN. AND WE KNOW THEY WENT AFTER HIM BECAUSE THEY TOLD US THAT, TOO. THE HEAD OF COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AT THE FBI, THE DAY THEY INTERVIEWED HIM, 2017, WHAT TO HIS NOTES SAY? THE GOAL IS TO GET FLYNN TO LIES OF THE BEACON PROCESS HIM OR TO GET HIM FIRED.

THINK ABOUT WHAT THE OBAMA DOJ, WHAT THEIR ADMINISTRATION DID IN THE LAST MONTH THEY WERE IN POWER FOURTH — THEY WERE EMPOWERED? JANUARY 4, THE FAMOUS MEETING IN THE OVAL OFFICE, THEY ARE ALL IN THEIR PLOTTING A STRATEGY. JANUARY 6, THE TRUMP TOWER IN BRIEFS THE PRESIDENT-ELECT ON THE DOSSIER THAT THEY ALREADY KNOW IS FALSE JUST SO THAT THEY CAN THINK TO THE PRESS AND THE PRESS AND WRITE THE STORY THAT HE WAS BRIEF. AND OF COURSE, JANUARY 24, THE DAY THAT THEY GO TO SET UP MICHAEL FLYNN, SET UP MICHAEL FLYNN IN HIS INTERVIEW. GUESS WHAT ELSE THEY DID? GUESS WHAT ELSE THEY DID BETWEEN ELECTION DAY AND INAUGURATION DAY? 38 PEOPLE 49 TIMES UNMASK HIS NAME.

COMEY, KLAPPER, BIDEN, SEVEN PEOPLE AT THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT UNMASK HIS NAME FOR GOODNESS SAKES. OF COURSE, HE RESIGNS ON FEBRUARY 13. HE RESIGNS ON FEBRUARY 13. NOW THE COVER-UP IS COMPLETE. FLYNN IS GONE, EVERYTHING IS FINE, THEY THINK, UNTIL MAY 9, 2017, WHEN PRESIDENT TRUMP FIRES JIM COMEY. NOW THEY HAVE A PROBLEM AGAIN. THE GUY WHO WAS GOING TO KEEP IT ALL I IT HAS BEEN FIRED. NOW HOW DO THEY CONTINUE THE COVER-UP? REAL SIMPLE. JIM COMEY LEAKS HIS MEMOS WITH THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF GETTING A SPECIAL COUNSEL APPOINTED TO INVESTIGATE SOMETHING THEY KNOW ISN’T TRUE, WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. TWO YEARS, 500 WITNESSES, $30 MILLION IN COSTS TO THE TAXPAYER AND THEY COME BACK WITH NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

SO, ALL THEY HAVE GOT LEFT IS TO ATTACK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAD THE RAGE TO STATE THE TRUTH FROM THE GET-GO THE FIRST TIME THAT HE TESTIFIED. YOU GUYS ATTACK HIM EVERY DAY, EVERY WEEK, NO YOU FILE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. IT’S RIDICULOUS. HE HAD THE COURAGE TO DO WHAT NO ONE ELSE WOULD DO AT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. SALLY YATES WOULDN’T CALL IT SPYING. ROD ROSENSTEIN WOULDN’T DO IT. CHRIS WADE SURE AS HECK ISN’T GOING TO DO IT.

ATTORNEY GENERAL, I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR HAVING THE COURAGE TO CALL IT WHAT IT WAS, SPYING, FOR HAVING THE COURAGE TO SAY THAT WE ARE GETTING THE POLITICS OUT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THAT HAD BEEN THERE IN THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION AND MOST OF LATE, WE WILL BE TALKING ABOUT THIS ON OUR SIDE OF RUSSIAN, THANK YOU FOR DEFENDING LAW ENFORCEMENT. FOR POINTING OUT WHAT A CRAZY IDEA THE DEFUND THE POLICE POLICY, WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT, IS, AND STANDING UP FOR THE RULE OF LAW. WE HAVE A VIDEO WE WANT TO SHOW THE THREAT TO THIS. CAN WE PLAY THAT VIDEO, PLEASE? [NO AUDIO] COLLECTS CLEAR AND HOW I CHARACTERIZE IT. IT’S MOSTLY A PROTEST. IT IS NOT, GENERALLY SPEAKING, UNRULY. X PEACEFUL PROTESTS. X PEACEFUL PROTESTS.”

Transcript from CSPAN.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR